Red Dead Redemption is a fantastic game. It was last year
when it was first released, it continues to be now and, in a decade or so when
people look back at important videogames (again, since we all love doing it so much),
Red Dead Redemption will stand out as a significant and crucial release. The
reasons for this are many and have been detailed plenty of times elsewhere,
particularly last year when it was the focus of everyone’s conversation, but it
is still worth pointing out anyway because games like this don’t come along
very often, and deserve all the attention that they can get. That is why, over
a year since it released, I’m still going ahead with my own series of posts
about the game -- simply put, it inspires a lot of thoughts and discussion, and
I’m certainly not excluded from that fact.
So, what do I think about the game? Well, as I’ve said twice
now, it was my introduction to the Western genre, so it was
especially interesting playing the game with that in mind, discovering and
learning about the core qualities of that particular genre. Perhaps even more
fascinating, however, was how I came to realise that Red Dead Redemption is an
even better take on the old Wild West because it doesn’t specifically focus on
the genre’s tropes or quirks, and instead treats them as mere details in a much
larger, broader experience. Beyond that, my fascination with game spaces saw
another intriguing game to consider, given how incredible RDR’s environment is
-- both in scope, and in detail. Of course, being a Rockstar game the
atmosphere and sense of place in Red Dead Redemption isn’t surprising, but it’s
still very interesting to think about because, I feel, the game stepped it up
another level again -- even over Grand Theft Auto IV, in some respects.
Finally, I was interested in the game because it seemed like Rockstar were
intending to continue their more mature approach to their storytelling, first
seen in Liberty City and GTA IV. While some characters are questionable, for
the most part it really came across as if Rockstar were trying to pioneer, yet
again, with Red Dead’s narrative, and the end result of that is remarkable,
depending on the context. I will address the game’s characters, general plot
and my connections to both in future posts but, for now, let’s talk about my
introduction to the genre, and the game’s interesting use of its environment.
Why hello, Mr. Marston
Entering into a game (or any entertainment product, really)
that adheres to a specific experience with no idea of what to expect is,
somewhat, surreal. Red Dead Redemption’s general adoption of Rockstar’s open
world template, however, ensured that there were enough features in the game
that were familiar to me whilst I learned about all of the elements that were
foreign: I knew about their emphasis on atmosphere and a sense of place in an
expansive environment; I knew how the game ‘felt’ due to its similarities to
Grand Theft Auto; and I was also quite familiar with the game’s structure of
cut-scenes, objectives, and then rewards. This allowed my attention to be
firmly focused on everything that was new (to me), meaning that I was able to
get engrossed a lot quicker than I initially expected to. What I wasn’t
expecting, however, was how the Western status of the game took a back seat to
the rest of the experience -- it is a videogame based in a Western setting, not
necessarily a Western itself.
This was surprising
to me because, before release, I was totally expecting the videogame version of
a Western. That was how (I thought) the game was advertised throughout its hype
campaign and the various previews and interviews, and that was what I wanted
because, as I keep on repeating, I was new to the genre and wanted to use the
game to see whether I liked it or not. And it did answer that question, too --
I did get to see what a Western entailed, and I did get to understand what my
own personal stance on such a specific experience would ultimately be, but I
acquired that insight indirectly as I engaged the whole adventure and not just
certain aspects of it. On the surface, the tropes and incidental details that
you’d expect from a Western -- duels, train robberies, cowboys saying
“giddy-up”, etc. -- are present and
accounted for but these traditional elements of the genre simply aren’t thrown
in your face in Red Dead Redemption. Instead, they exist in the background:
just like sheriffs and ranches do, like cacti and wolves, and, indeed, like the
desolate landscape itself. They aren’t included in the game to ensure its
authenticity to the genre or to inform its players that, yes, Red Dead Redemption
is a Western; they’re merely details in a world full of them, and they give
this world weight through their beautiful, delicate, coherency. Recognising
that fact -- that RDR is a game with a Western setting, rather than one that is a Western -- took some time and didn’t occur until well after I had
finished the game. But once I did acknowledge this subtle distinction, I
realised that it enriches the experience in the same way that the little things do for other titles.
Attention to detail is one of Red Dead Redemption’s most
significant qualities, but I think it would be fair to say that most people
wouldn’t think about what it does or doesn’t do with the genre as one of the
areas in which the game carefully creates its overall experience. I would
argue, however, that this is why the game is so remarkable to begin with: it took
a genre from another medium, adopted the essence of it for a new one, and
masterfully turned it into something that wasn’t just unique, it was only
possible as a videogame.
On The Lone Prairie
Not too long ago I wrote a post expressing my disdain with the notion that, eventually, Liberty City from Grand Theft Auto
IV would be forgotten in favour of more impressive environments, perhaps even
from another GTA. As technology and graphical fidelity continue to progress --
among other things -- I can see a future in which Liberty City is no longer
considered a technical achievement or a sense of wonder, indirectly allowing
for it to become a memory much in the same way that, say, the entirety of San
Andreas has -- a particularly fond memory, undoubtedly, but a memory
nonetheless.
Well, unsurprisingly, I feel the same way about Red Dead
Redemption’s magnificent depiction of the Wild West. Like Liberty City, I believe
that the game’s environment is one of the best examples we have yet of a world that
feels like it truly exists; only this time the game’s particular setting
ensures that we’re revisiting a bygone era, rather than a modern metropolis. The
sense of place, life and, of course, atmosphere in Red Dead Redemption is
unparalleled, and somewhat conveniently exists as the demonstration of what the
opposite of Liberty City could and should be. Instead of the urban jungle we
have an expansive piece of land which teams with wildlife, sporadic hints of
civilization, and which features a surprising amount of variety. I will address
that last one in a future post but the point is that there is simply nothing
like Red Dead Redemption’s landscape, and the fact that it is so incredibly
detailed and full of unexpected surprises is not only a testament to Rockstar’s
prowess with creating these virtual worlds in which we get to inhabit, but to
their ability to showcase some of this generation’s most significant technical
achievements, too. Few other developers can pull off such a large environment
that is full with things to see and do, and fewer still can also provide a
place in which key, personal moments can occur for each and
every player.
But it’s not about how impressive or special it can be;
rather, it’s about how in the not too distant future I get the impression that,
yet again, Red Dead Redemption’s landscape is going to be forgotten in favour
of something else that is bigger, better, and certainly more beautiful. Right
now that sounds absurd but we’re talking about a videogame, too -- the medium
progresses at an insane rate and, as we’ve seen time and time again, it only
takes a couple of years before a game is completely outclassed by something
newer. Just look at the differences between The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion and
The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim for an example of what I am talking about: both
games are amazing at the time of their release, but the inevitable iteration
and technical advancements of the medium ensure that, eventually, they’re seen
as less impressive and even, at times, ugly. As we reach and surpass the
uncanny valley and photo-realism that problem becomes less significant but,
right now, it’s still an issue and because of this I fear that, like Liberty
City, Red Dead’s world will become nothing more than a memory for the majority
of people because there simply won’t be any reason to visit it anymore. There
will be better and, while I can’t wait to see what that might
actually be myself, I also dread it because I personally believe that these
environments that we already have now -- today, in the current generation --
should be cherished and even celebrated -- if not for their impressive
coherency, than certainly because of all the resources, hard work and effort
that went into making them.
Ultimately this disdain I feel for the (potential) future of
these game spaces is a personal thing that I have developed alongside my
passion for virtual spaces as a whole, and while important it doesn’t
necessarily reflect how I feel about the future. I’m eagerly awaiting what
might appear on the horizon, and already have some idea of what that future
entails with games like BioShock Infinite taking us to places that, once again,
we cannot go in reality. The future is very bright when it comes to virtual
worlds, but I’m not going to jump up and celebrate their arrival if, as a
consequence, what we already have now is left behind and forgotten. That’s not
the kind of approach I want to take with a medium I hold so dear, and that’s
why I’m a little more reluctant to proceed than the majority of gamers out
there.
***
That’s some of my initial observations about Red Dead
Redemption. A review, if you will, of some of the things that stood out to me upon the game’s completion. Naturally, being a Rockstar game means
there is plenty more to talk about, and what I’ve covered above is only
scratching the surface. In my next post I will discuss the opening moments of
the game, and how they effectively set up the overall experience whether we
realise it or not -- where better to start covering such a large game than the
beginning?
Posts
